top of page

Blog Newsletter Sign Up

Sign up to get the latest blog posts straight to your inbox—spam NOT included.

Main Interest

What Does “Safety” Really Mean in Relationships? Debunking the Modern Misuse of the Word

  • Writer: Stephanie Underwood, RSW
    Stephanie Underwood, RSW
  • 6 days ago
  • 3 min read

Written by Stephanie Underwood, RSW



What Does “Safety” Really Mean in Relationships?


In recent years, the concept of “safety” in relationships has become a buzzword, widely used but rarely understood in its truest sense. Emotional safety is essential for healthy relationships, yet somewhere along the way, the definition of safety has become diluted, confused, and at times, misused. This distortion often stems from cultural shifts that, while well-intentioned, have inadvertently contributed to emotional avoidance rather than growth.


In this post, we’ll break down what relational safety really means, why it’s essential, and how the overuse of terms like “trigger warning” has complicated our ability to navigate discomfort, a necessary part of intimacy and connection.


The True Definition of Safety in Relationships


Relational safety isn’t about living in a bubble where nothing ever feels hard or uncomfortable. Safety in a relationship, whether romantic, familial, or therapeutic, refers to a sense of emotional trust. It means:


  • Feeling seen and accepted as you are.

  • Knowing that your vulnerability won’t be used against you.

  • Being able to express discomfort, hurt, or fear without fear of retaliation or emotional abandonment.

  • Trusting that repair is possible after rupture.


True safety involves accountability, honest communication, and the ability to work through conflict together. It doesn’t mean the absence of triggers or hard conversations. It means security in knowing you can navigate those moments without being shamed, silenced, or emotionally punished.


How “Trigger Warnings” Distorted the Meaning of Safety


The term “trigger warning” originated as a trauma-informed tool, primarily used in therapeutic or academic spaces to give survivors of trauma the ability to emotionally prepare before engaging with potentially distressing content. The intention was thoughtful and compassionate.


However, over time, “trigger warnings” became widely used outside their original context. They’ve turned into social scripts that can suggest any emotional discomfort is dangerous, and that to feel safe, we must be shielded from all forms of emotional activation.


Here’s the unintended consequence:


Avoiding anything that feels triggering doesn’t lead to safety, it leads to emotional fragility. We start to equate any discomfort with being unsafe, and in doing so, we lose our capacity to engage in relational repair, growth, and complexity.


Safety is not Equal to Comfort


It’s important to name a hard truth: Relational safety and comfort are not the same thing.


Growth often feels uncomfortable. Facing our own patterns, sitting with shame, talking about our emotional needs, or hearing that we’ve hurt someone, these things are not comfortable. But they can still happen in a safe relationship.


In fact, a relationship where you’re never challenged might feel emotionally stagnant, not secure. Safety provides the foundation for those uncomfortable conversations to occur in a way that leads to connection, not collapse.


Boundaries or Emotional Avoidance?


In the current cultural climate, it’s become easier to cut people off than to work through rupture. Social media often promotes avoidance as empowerment: “If they trigger you, block them.” But not every emotional activation is a threat. Not every trigger is a reason to sever.


Boundaries are necessary, yes. But we must ask:

Are we using “safety” as a way to avoid our emotional edges? Or are we willing to sit with our discomfort long enough to transform it?


There is a difference between someone hurting you repeatedly and someone activating an old wound. The first may warrant distance. The second may be an invitation to heal, with the right support and context.


Reclaiming a Balanced Definition of Safety


To move forward, we need to reclaim what emotional safety truly is:


  • It’s not about always agreeing.

  • It’s not about never being triggered.

  • It’s not about staying in your comfort zone.


Emotional safety is about accountability, respect, curiosity, communication, and repair. It’s the foundation that makes deeper healing possible, not a shield from all emotional experience.


Final Thoughts


If you’ve found yourself avoiding conflict, overusing boundaries, or labeling every hard conversation as “unsafe,” you’re not alone. The past decade has brought important conversations to the forefront, but it’s also brought confusion.


Let’s start being more precise with our language.

Let’s build relationships that feel safe enough to hold both tenderness and truth. Because real safety isn’t about never being triggered, it’s about knowing you’ll be met with care when you are.


Ready to Explore Your Attachment Style and Build Safer Connections?


Book a free 30-minute consultation through Healing Narratives Counselling to explore how trauma-informed therapy can support your emotional growth and relational security.



Comments


bottom of page